- Latest Updated Guilds
-










Kaizen
N/A · Korgath -










The Logical Cube
#21k · Darkmoon Faire -










Hella Skellatons
N/A · Bloodhoof -










Echidna
N/A · Medivh -










Deep Tranquility
#2k · Ragnaros
- Latest Forum Threads
-
3GS Iphone 32GB......Nokia N97 32GB $270...
General Class Board | · An hour ago -
F/S: 3GS Iphone 32GB....Blackberry Bold ...
General Discussion | · An hour ago -
Between 3.3 and Cataclysm
General Discussion | · 3 hours ago -
WoW Dev Interview: The Heart and Souls o...
News & Debate | · 11 hours ago -
Patch 3.3 - Icecrown Raid Testing Stream...
News & Debate | · 16 hours ago
-
20/11
WoW Dev Interview: The Heart a...
-
20/11
Lady Deathwhisper Encounter: N...
-
19/11
Patch 3.3 Background Download,...
-
19/11
Shadowmourne Discovered
-
18/11
Icecrown Citadel Raid Access P...
-
18/11
World of Raids Interviews Greg...
-
17/11
Patch 3.3 PTR - Build 10835
-
17/11
Icecrown Citadel Testing - Nov...
-
17/11
Shadowmourne - Legendary Weapo...
Source
Man I really Need that Mail piece! /sigh
![]() Vallya | Can we please talk about the new Need before Greed rules in 5man pugs re: armor types not being Needable if they are outside your class?
This means Shaman, good luck needing that leather piece that dropped, even if you are the only caster. "But Vallya, surely you can just tell them all to pass so you can Greed" You're assuming the intelligence of your average cross-server pug DPS is high enough to support doing anything but clicking /de every time something drops that isn't leather. "Butbutbut classes should have dibs if its their armor type!" Fine with me. If we have an ele shaman and a holy pally in a group and the shaman needs the mail, give it to him if thats your desire. Just don't remove my ability to hit Need as well if its an upgrade to supersede the Greed of others that just want to sell it. |
# 14 - October 28, 2009, 12:18 pm Looting to some extent is always going to have a heavily social component. There's only so much we can do (or should do) to try and "solve" that problem for players. On the other hand, the new LFG system also removes some of the social checks and balances (not that those are huge to begin with) by potentially grouping you with folks you may never see again. On my server, perennial ninjas and jerks earn a reputation. That's going to be harder when you're talking about a battle group. Overall we expect players to just pug a lot more often, because the new system really is that good. So overall the drama over who gets the healing shoulders might arise more often. :( Ultimately, our logic went like this: If a Holy paladin loses a great non-plate upgrade to another player, one out of five players might feel bad. If a Holy paladin rolls Need on every type of armor that drops, then four out of five players might have a bad experience. The jerk potential seemed worse than the lost-an-upgrade potential as far as whether or not players buy into using the new dungeon tool. You can still Greed a potential upgrade item. You can still talk to your group and explain that X is an awesome item for you and would they mind passing on it or even trading it? (You can trade BoP items for a short period of time following the same rules that apply today.) Ghostcrawler Lead Systems Designer |
# 80 - October 28, 2009, 5:06 pm
I think that works if you run with a group who all agree on what all the rules mean. In a true pug situation I think nothing would get disenchanted because people wold roll Greed for fear that they would be the only one not to Greed. But I would definitely encourage you to still try and work out your policy even in a pug. There is a ton of baggage that has been built up about loot etiquette over the years. One of the things that has amazed me working on the dungeon feature is how differently various realms (or even parts or the world) handle loot. And of course many people are amazed to find not everyone does things their way / the right way. :) Like any big new feature I'm sure we will need to tweak things over time once we see how people really use it. Often it's the unexpected reaction that turns out to be the biggest issue. Ghostcrawler Lead Systems Designer |
# 81 - October 28, 2009, 5:10 pm
Development is easy. Explaining complex rules to a broad audience is hard. I've played a lot of games that were clearly supposed to be aimed at hardcore gamers who don't mind complexity. WoW isn't one of those games. Many forum posters dramatically, dramatically underestimate how sophisticated they are in their WoW comprehension compared to the average player. Ghostcrawler Lead Systems Designer |
# 82 - October 28, 2009, 5:14 pm
Yes. I'm not sure if everyone realizes that. Need Before Greed is forced when you add random players to a 5-player group. You can use whatever loot system you choose when you use /invite to form the group. To try and improve the pug experience (at least pugs formed through the tool) we wanted to try and minimize jerkish behavior, and that includes not giving the leader a whole lot of power. I'm not talking about a player who thinks it's funny to pull the entire instance and wipe you. I'm talking about players who legitimately want to run the dungeon but have very non-conventional ideas about leadership or loot distribution. We are trying to impose a little bit of convention on these groups so that everyone has a better pug experience. Ghostcrawler Lead Systems Designer |
# 91 - October 28, 2009, 5:43 pm
I agree. A lot of people think they use Need before Greed but are really just needing or greeding through Group Loot. It is perhaps an overly jargon-laden system with subtle differences. Ghostcrawler Lead Systems Designer |


