- Latest Updated Guilds
-










OP
#3k · Haomarush -










Most Wanted Postals
N/A · Dragonblight -










Sixth sensE
#22k · Illidan -










Enigma
N/A · Blackwing Lair -










Zero Gravitas
#423 · Runetotem
- Latest Forum Threads
-
[A] pug ToGC25 cleared - tribute to skil...
Guild Progress | · few seconds ago -
Patch 3.3 PTR Testing - Professor Putric...
News & Debate | · 4 hours ago -
Stamina - A Balanced Comparison
Tanks | · 18 hours ago -
how to install someone posted ui
User Interface and Macros | · 22 hours ago -
Patch 3.3 PTR Testing - Valithria Dreamw...
News & Debate | · 22 hours ago
-
07/11
Patch 3.3 PTR Testing - Profes...
-
06/11
Patch 3.3 PTR Testing - Valith...
-
06/11
3.3 PTR Testing - Lady Deathwh...
-
06/11
3.3 PTR Build 10772
-
05/11
Updated: Patch 3.3 - Paladin /...
-
04/11
The Pet Store: Buy In-Game WoW...
-
04/11
Icecrown Raid Difficulty Funct...
-
04/11
Patch 3.3 PTR Build 10747
-
03/11
Professor Putricide Preview
Source
Class vs. damage in Arenas
# 0 - January 2, 2009, 2:21 pm Caveats: Please don't derail this thread. It it liable to get long. Also please do not take my comments out of context or attempt to read too much between the lines. I hate having to communicate like a politician. :( The same classes keep coming up in Arena discussions: rogues, mages, death knights and paladins. In a world with low resilience, it is perhaps unsurprising that classes that combine burst damage with so many tools for avoiding damage would be powerful. Let's set aside the discussion of these classes for a moment (and to be fair, it is probably specs, not classes). My question is this: In an Arena match in which none of those 4 are participating, do you feel that damage is too high *given* that it will only come down once players acquire more resilience? If you can't tell, I am trying to get the community to explore whether it is those classes or damage in general that is causing so much consternation. |

