- Latest Updated Guilds
-










Nordanvind
#19k · Quel'Thalas -










No Reprieve
#3k · Magtheridon -










Stronghold
#23k · Arathor -










OP
#3k · Haomarush -










Nightmare EU
#5k · Thunderhorn
- Latest Forum Threads
-
Patch 3.3 PTR Testing - Professor Putric...
News & Debate | · An hour ago -
Stamina - A Balanced Comparison
Tanks | · 16 hours ago -
how to install someone posted ui
User Interface and Macros | · 20 hours ago -
Patch 3.3 PTR Testing - Valithria Dreamw...
News & Debate | · 20 hours ago -
game designers should read this.
Feedback & Suggestions | · 23 hours ago
-
07/11
Patch 3.3 PTR Testing - Profes...
-
06/11
Patch 3.3 PTR Testing - Valith...
-
06/11
3.3 PTR Testing - Lady Deathwh...
-
06/11
3.3 PTR Build 10772
-
05/11
Updated: Patch 3.3 - Paladin /...
-
04/11
The Pet Store: Buy In-Game WoW...
-
04/11
Icecrown Raid Difficulty Funct...
-
04/11
Patch 3.3 PTR Build 10747
-
03/11
Professor Putricide Preview
Source
Why Battle.net 2.0 Needs a Subscription Fee
![]() Faithfellshort | At first I was turned off to the idea of playing a montly, or yearly fee to play StarCraft II on the new Battle.net, but then I read a post which I will now quote. This quote is what changed my mind:
And that right there is almost enough to make me want to pay to play. I will not be poisoned by your bitterness. |
# 25 - June 4, 2009, 3:08 pm For those listening to the latest Activision Blizzard conference call, Mike Morhaime also mentions it there as well. |
# 33 - June 4, 2009, 4:09 pm
Making sure players of all levels are able to have a fun multiplayer experience is a top priority for us. More info regarding this effort will be revealed in conjunction with info on Battle.net. For now, know that if you don't have 300 APM...it’s quite OK. We've got plans to keep online play fun and challenging at the same time, while also making the atmosphere feel less intimidating for the vast majority of us who aren’t pro-level players. |


