World of Raids Forums: Elemental Shaman Changes, Hunter/Warlock Arena Issues, Blue Posts - World of Raids Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Elemental Shaman Changes, Hunter/Warlock Arena Issues, Blue Posts

#1 User is offline   WoRBot Icon

  • The Newsbringer
  • Icon
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 0
  • Joined: 23-April 08

Posted 25 November 2008 - 04:59 PM

Upcoming Elemental Shaman Changes

Quote from: Ghostcrawler (Source)

We are making some upcoming changes to the Elemental shaman tree. Our goal was to streamline a few of the utility-based talents while giving shamans a little more damage scaling in later tiers of gear.

1) Unrelenting Storm – reduced from 5 points to 3 points. Bonus is 4/8/12% of your Intellect returned as mana.
2) Elemental Warding – now reduces all damage (not just Nature, Fire and Frost) taken by 2/4/6%
3) Elemental Shields – this talent has been removed, since its effects were combined with Elemental Warding.
4) Storm, Earth and Fire – reduced from 5 points to 3 points, but keeps around the same net benefit. In addition to current effects, also increases Wind Shock range. The damage bonus to Flame Shock has increased to 60% at 3 ranks. Storm, Earth and Fire has been moved up the tree as well.
5) Shamanism – this is a new 5 point talent in the old Storm, Earth and Fire position. Your Lightning Bolt and Lava Burst gain an additional percentage of your bonus damage. We have not finalized the numbers, but it will probably be something like 10% for Lightning Bolt and 20% for Lava Burst at max ranks.

These changes will be available in the next minor content patch, and are in addition to the AE changes mentioned previously.

Arena Issues Discussion

Hunter (Source)

Because it is so difficult to get intelligent discussion on this topic, I am creating this new thread.

It will be heavily moderated.

You don't have to play a hunter to post here. But I am only interested in a discussion of mechanics, problems, ideas and solutions.

This is not a place to request a massive overhaul of talents. This is not a place for your 5 page manifesto on how to redesign the class. This is not a place to whine about past neglect or how Blizzard doesn't understand or care about class. This is not a place to declare hunters are OP and how we should pay attention to a different class.

Please stay focused. :)

Concise posts are more useful.

Warlock (Source)

Same text as Hunter post.

Blue Posts

Classes Becoming Too Similar (Source)

Getting to a point where different classes or specs feel too similar is definitely something we're concerned about. I wish players would consider that some players share this concern every time they ask for "a distance closer, because all classes have that," or "a use for Spirit, because all classes have that." Sometimes when we don't make a change that several players are asking for, this is why.

We think we have a long way to go before classes are truly homogenized, but it is a concern.

Spellpower Plate (Source)

It would feel very elegant to get rid of healing plate. But it is a pretty major change and one you aren't likely to see anytime soon.

The logical choice is to make Holy (and all paladin healing really) scale off of AP somehow. But then you also need to solve the mana pool and regen problems because melee dps rings don't have int or mp5 on them.

It's not an impossible problem to solve, but it is a big one. Changing melee druids to share a lot of gear with rogues has been tricky and something we are still working on.

Wrath's Dungeon Difficulty (Source)

We wanted to make sure players actually ran the level-up dungeons and we wanted to make sure players didn't hit the introductory raid content like a brick wall. Those are both good things, in our mind.

We certainly know how to design encounters that you can't just AE tank and AE dps your way through. In the meantime, it's nice that the instances are being seen by more than just a small percent of players. :)

Mana Regen and Spirit (Source)

As a few players have referenced, we thought mana regen got to a point at the end of BC where players could just generally ignore it and assumed that mana was just a system you eventually graduate out of (kind of like experience).

We don't want you to be out of mana constantly, but we do want the risk of that to exist. We balance some spells based on their mana cost for example and when you can always use your most expensive, least efficient spell without consequence, then your cheap and efficient spells don't compete.

Mana is a resource to be managed, much like health or cooldowns.

Dual Spec: No ETA (Source)

We don't have an ETA. We would love to get it in for 3.1 but if I said it will be in 3.1 and it isn't, then players get mad. It's easier if we just say "soon."

Posted Image Druid (Skills / Talents / Glyphs)

Upcoming Feral Changes: Armor (Source)

We changed the way armor worked because we thought it was a bad design that a druid with the Naxx 25 armor trinkets would be amazing and one lacking them would be far behind, perhaps to the extent that you wouldn't be invited to tank. As a few people have pointed out, the change to the armor calculation is as much of a nerf as not getting those trinkets to drop is a nerf.

Having armor as a good stat is fun. Having armor as such a good stat that you don't really care what else the item has on it is a problem. (And to be fair, I initially didn't realize the situation was quite as broken as it was, so thanks to all the persistent druids out there on this and other forums.) While some of you liked the element of having to get a couple of fairly rare drops to be a really good tank, other druids seem to understand the problem and agree with the change.

Upcoming Feral Changes: Stuff besides armor (Source)

The other part of the design is that without bonus armor being so ridiculously good for druids, you are left with fewer stats on which you can try to improve your tanking survivability. This is the "It may have been broken, but it's all we had" argument.

While I think it is a bit silly to totally discount Stamina ("because nobody wants to be a mana sponge") and Dodge ("because it has diminishing returns") as bad tank stats, overall we are sympathetic to the idea that it's fun to get drops that make you a better tank and druids don't get to do that as much as other classes. We're talking about other ways to scale your mitigation through gear. I don't have any announcements to make about how that would work, but you should keep a couple of things in mind: 1) We wouldn't want to do it through armor or dodge, since making it easier to get those values very high unsolves the problem again, 2) Adding additional mitigation of any kind would probably mean having to nerf Ferals in other ways (like say armor) to keep you from getting too far ahead of other tanks. But we need to see what block actually does for paladins and warriors too.

Posted Image Paladin (Skills / Talents / Glyphs)

Consolidated Changes Clarified (Source)

We have already announced or suggested all of these changes would be forthcoming in the next minor content patch. I thought I would list them all in one place for ease of use.

Divine Shield: Penalty changed so that all damage done is reduced by 50% instead of a attack speed penalty.

1) Divine Protection no longer causes an attack penalty. Divine Shield's penalty was changed to 50% less damage done by the paladin.

2) Sacred Duty: This Protection talent no longer affects the attack penalty of Divine Shield and Divine Protection, but grants additional bonus Stamina.

3) Avenging Wrath, Divine Shield, Divine Protection, and Hand of Protection have a shared, 30-second cooldown. The Forbearance effect is no longer triggered by Avenging Wrath.

CLARIFICATION: You can use Hand of Protection while under the shared cooldown. You just can't use it on yourself.

4) Judgement of Wisdom now returns a percentage of base mana instead of a percentage of max mana.

5) All mana drain effects now return a percentage of max enemy mana (making mana drains less punishing to paladins and other characters without large mana pools.)

6) Judgements of the Pure: This Holy talent now increases the damage done by Seals and Judgements in addition to its current effects.

7) Hand of Judgement - All paladins receive a single-target, 30 yard taunt on an 8 sec cooldown. This spell also does minor Holy damage in order to break CC and the like for pulling ease.


EDIT: Clarified HoJ, J o' Pure and taunt.

...more (Source)

I made some clarifications to my initial post.

You can use Hand of Protection during the internal cooldown, just not on yourself. The idea is to prevent the paladin from being able to combo damage immunity. We want you to still be able to use it on others.

The change to Judgements of the Pure is in addition to its current haste effects.

The taunt is called Hand of Judgement. It has a 30 yard range and 8 sec cooldown. It does a bit of Holy damage so that you can break sheep or freezing traps to pull mobs.

The change to Judgement of Wisdom was so Protection and Ret paladins (and Feral druids and whoever else) didn't feel like they were supposed to stack Int for mana, since there is none on their gear. We picked a number that shouldn't be a nerf to most Holy paladins, though it will mean that it won't keep scaling as your Int climbs, so I imagine it will be called a nerf anyway. :) We'll keep an eye on this -- perhaps adding an effect to a Holy talent or something to increase the return.

Posted Image Shaman (Skills / Talents / Glyphs)

Totems (Source)

I realize buffing totems sounds strange to players who are used to loltotems. One of the designers just made the comment that telling Elemental you are buffing damage totems would be like telling Holy priests we are nerfing CoH and you're expected to area heal with Holy Nova now. :)

Totems are a core piece of the shaman design. We want to make them work, not remove them from the game.

Magma Totem Change Details (Source)

But the change to Magma Totem in particular is substantial. The base points went from 170 to 370 and the coefficient from 0.67 to 1.0. In our tests, the pulses were doing something like 600 damage. You would be hard-pressed to get that kind of increase out of Totem of Wrath, even considering its benefit to the whole raid.

Yes you have to run up, but we don't think that is too much to ask considering you can still Chain Lightning or whatever while the totem does its thing.

Posted Image Warrior (Skills / Talents / Glyphs)

Heroic Leap (Source)

Heroic Leap on the other hand let players click anywhere they wanted to try and cheese pathing. Eventually, some of them found holes in the terrain they could jump through. Fixing all of those potential problem areas in the terrain was a pretty heavy price to pay for one talent.

We could have changed Heroic Leap to not have a targeting component, like Blink and Disengage, but we thought that would make it Blink and Disengage.

Please don't turn every issue into "Blizzard hates my class."

Realm First 80

Now that Wrath of the Lich King has been out for a while, it's likely that most NA and EU realms have a level 80.  What class/race was the first to 80 for your realm?  For Kilrogg, a Human Warrior and Night Elf Rogue both hit 80 at right around the same time (they were leveling together), though apparently only the Human Warrior got credit for the Realm First 80 achievement in the realm wide broadcast.

Sartharion with 3 Drakes Up

Quite a few guilds now have killed Sartharion while leaving the 3 drakes alive for the encounter.  This of course rewards the raid with the Heroic: The Twilight Zone achievement, "Twilight Vanquisher" title, and the Twilight Drake.  Head over to the Guild Progress forum to find out who all has done it, and feel free to post if your guild has too!


0

#2 User is offline   Hagnus Icon

  • Where is Mankrik's wife?
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 2
  • Joined: 17-August 06

Posted 25 November 2008 - 06:15 PM

They must not have dinged 80 at the exact same time , since me and my gf had no problem both getting achivement when we dinged 80 realm first at the same time
0

#3 User is offline   Meleg Icon

  • HE's your baby's daddy?!
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 354
  • Joined: 07-August 08
  • Character Name: Conpanna

Posted 25 November 2008 - 06:25 PM

http://new.worldofraids.com/public/style_emoticons/dark/http://www.worldofraids.com/forums/iPhorum/smilies/confused.gif

Wouldn't it make more sense to link to the Wowhead site's Realm First 80 link rather than Wowdb? Wowdb has kind of turned into the red headed stepchild of wow database websites and is vastly less popular.

http://www.wowdb.com...ent.aspx?id=457
http://www.wowhead.c...achievement=457

http://siteanalytics....com/?metric=uv

There must be some sort of behind-the-scenes casual relationship between WOR and WoWDB I'm not aware of which is kind of lul-worthy. I think this link says it in so many fewer words:

http://www.worldofra...58&postcount=17

Also, according to the latest poll on your site I thought I remembered the large majority of visitors choosing to visit WoR for News and Blue Posts, not guild progression, no?

There are much cleaner sites for progression (eg. wowprogress.com) and the argument for this was promptly (and unfortunately) closed by the WoR moderators: http://www.worldofra...ead.php?t=19906

The counter argument, "if you don't want to read about these kills, then don't click on the forum" is a glib response meant to quell a valid point. Take a look at that sub forum and one will quickly notice that no thread announcing WOTLK progression has more than this one ~ 5800 views, likely a minuscule portion of the unique hits WoR gets daily. Most are in the 0-2000 range and this will likely go down as guild names become less recognizable. (names like Method, Inner Sanctum, and Premo are bound to get a few clicks by nature of the beast)

Maybe I'm barking up the wrong tree on the issue, but I can't help but think WoR's support of such a sub forum stems from the fact several of its mods play in endgame guilds. If WoR made a wowprogress.com-esque listing I'm confident they'd see an enormous surge in traffic, potentially driving site revenue up with their PPC ads - just a suggestion. In fact, I'd bet a hefty sum they could single-handedly dominate that domain of wow interest; a forum format is so gauche.
0

#4 User is online   Kody Icon

  • Thorim, bro, that's not your girl.
  • Icon
  • View gallery
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 2217
  • Joined: 15-January 07
  • Character Name: Kodylan
  • Class: Death Knight
  • Realm: US-Kilrogg

Posted 25 November 2008 - 07:09 PM

World of Raids and WOWDB are owned and operated by the same company: Curse.com.

And yes, you're right, that progress forum isn't exactly what I want. We have something in the works. :)

However, I feel guild progress on a raid-oriented website fits in with "news" as long as it's part of a larger news article.
Kody
Site Manager
World of Raids
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook!
0

#5 User is offline   Eulo Icon

  • Community Manager
  • Icon
  • Group: Moderators
  • Posts: 663
  • Joined: 31-July 08
  • LocationGrand Forks, ND, US
  • Character Name: Bodine
  • Class: Warlock
  • Realm: US-Greymane

Posted 25 November 2008 - 07:32 PM

I'd just like to address a few points.

Meleg said:

There are much cleaner sites for progression (eg. wowprogress.com) and the argument for this was promptly (and unfortunately) closed by the WoR moderators: http://www.worldofra...ead.php?t=19906


I closed that thread for multiple reasons. For one, it was not posted in the proper forum for that sort of discussion. Rather than moving to the Feedback forum, I chose to close it because it was not exactly a well constructed argument and most would probably agree it could be classified as trolling.

Also, the difference between a forum format and an ordered list of guilds is that the forum fosters discussion and congratulations where as a site like WoW Progress does not (to my knowledge) have that functionality. It may, I'm not entirely familiar with the site, but I guess it could be buried on the guild pages. Though if that is the case, it would be somewhat different and less intuitive. While in it's current state the threads in our progress forum do not get many replies, that is something we would like to see. However, please, save the flames for a different outlet :)

Meleg said:

The counter argument, "if you don't want to read about these kills, then don't click on the forum" is a glib response meant to quell a valid point.


To that I would say the argument in the original post -- "We do not care [ . . . ] it just showed us how easy and casual the game has become" -- is just as glib, if not more so. There were only a couple of individuals in that thread who agreed with the original post. It seems to me that complaining about someone posting their guild's progression in the "Guild Progress" forum is as absurd as complaining that someone posted a recruitment thread in the recruitment forums.

Presenting an alternative approach to the tracking method is one thing, but telling guilds to quit using the functionality that is already included on this site is something entirely different. The complaint in the original post was that the content in WotLK so far is easy and, for that reason, people do not care about the progress guilds are making on it, not that the forum was bad in general.

Meleg said:

Take a look at that sub forum and one will quickly notice that no thread announcing WOTLK progression has more than this one ~ 5800 views, likely a minuscule portion of the unique hits WoR gets daily. Most are in the 0-2000 range and this will likely go down as guild names become less recognizable. (names like Method, Inner Sanctum, and Premo are bound to get a few clicks by nature of the beast)

Maybe I'm barking up the wrong tree on the issue, but I can't help but think WoR's support of such a sub forum stems from the fact several of its mods play in endgame guilds. If WoR made a wowprogress.com-esque listing I'm confident they'd see an enormous surge in traffic, potentially driving site revenue up with their PPC ads - just a suggestion. In fact, I'd bet a hefty sum they could single-handedly dominate that domain of wow interest; a forum format is so gauche.


Now despite how it may sound, we do appreciate your feedback. I read everything posted on these forums and whenever anyone offers a suggestion for us, the staff takes it seriously. So I apologize for any confusion on the matter, but the thread that was closed was closed because it was a blanket attack on other posters. Your post in that thread presented a valid concern, and I sincerely apologize for squelching you, but it was not directly related to the original topic of the thread.
Eulo
Community Manager

World of Raids
"I don't believe in the sun."
0

#6 User is offline   Meleg Icon

  • HE's your baby's daddy?!
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 354
  • Joined: 07-August 08
  • Character Name: Conpanna

Posted 25 November 2008 - 07:37 PM

The WowDB thing - meh, we'll just have to live with it I suppose; I'm sure the cards will fall where they may. ZAM and Curse are competitors in a sense, but they both offer great options.

What you wrote makes a lot of sense, and I agree - the real argument in that thread was that the content was trivialized so there was this "we don't care" snarky attitude (which I disagree with). I think I glazed over the OP too quickly to actually digest the point. I DO care and so do a lot of others [even if it does feel slightly cheapened]; I'm glad you took my suggestion with a grain of salt and I'm excited to see what you have in store to improve upon that aspect of the site.
0

#7 User is offline   gamor61 Icon

  • Hogger
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 10
  • Joined: 18-November 08
  • Character Name: Gamor

Posted 25 November 2008 - 10:21 PM

Hagnus said:

They must not have dinged 80 at the exact same time , since me and my gf had no problem both getting achivement when we dinged 80 realm first at the same time


Yeah I was actually online when the two hit 80 on Kilrogg. The Rogue, Rizzen, got it within maybe 30 seconds of the Warrior, Fortune. They did not get it at the exact same moment, but they did level together throughout Northrend.
0

#8 User is offline   elitenls Icon

  • The Prophet Skeram
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 921
  • Joined: 31-March 08
  • Character Name: Angelicus

Posted 26 November 2008 - 05:48 AM

So glad to see continual updates even though nothing really big is happening ATM. As always, hats off to the staff for spider-botting and keeping us posted! :)
Posted Image
0

#9 User is offline   Nazd Icon

  • Hogger
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 15
  • Joined: 11-January 07

Posted 26 November 2008 - 08:53 AM

First 80 @ Lightning's Blade was, afaik Norm, a troll rogue, with full BT/SW gear and both warglaives :)
0

#10 User is offline   Ninkasi Icon

  • Where is Mankrik's wife?
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1
  • Joined: 14-June 07

Posted 26 November 2008 - 12:07 PM

This is in response to the news article regarding 2 apparent players dinging 80 off of the same kill and only one receiving the realm first 80 achievement.

Myself and friend, Lianne, on Kul'Tiras were the first two level 80s on the server, we dinged off of the same kill and were both awarded the Realm First 80 achievement. So I'm not sure if these 2 players did it differently then us when they dinged or what happened. But it is possible for two or more players to receive the achievement at the same time, it would seem.

Ninkasi
0

#11 User is online   Kody Icon

  • Thorim, bro, that's not your girl.
  • Icon
  • View gallery
  • Group: Administrators
  • Posts: 2217
  • Joined: 15-January 07
  • Character Name: Kodylan
  • Class: Death Knight
  • Realm: US-Kilrogg

Posted 26 November 2008 - 01:01 PM

I actually had to clarify what I wrote a bit last night, because apparently they both received the achievement (Fortune (Warrior) and Rizzen (Rogue)), but only Fortune got credit in the realm wide announcement.
Kody
Site Manager
World of Raids
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook!
0

#12 User is offline   AK47 Icon

  • Vaelastrasz the Corrupt
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 857
  • Joined: 30-May 08
  • Character Name: Raz

Posted 26 November 2008 - 03:07 PM

I wonder if blizzard works on anything nice to compensate the suppression of warrior Heroic Leap Talent.

And while I'm at it , I can't wait to get more news about character customization.
Why Not ? ^^
0

#13 User is offline   Afakaz Icon

  • Where is Mankrik's wife?
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 9
  • Joined: 17-September 08
  • Character Name: Gathrek

Posted 01 December 2008 - 10:38 PM

I'm not able to find any corroboration for this, but I recall Blizzard saying something about there being a 1 minute window after a realm-first achievement for other people to earn the same achievement
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users