[Eulo]

Gloo said:

Have no idea what part of their site i had read, all i know that the part i did read, was trash.
But, not only me. Sometime after the target dummies went live, around 10-12 lvl 80 mages (3 of them from my guild), of several specs, started testing their dps, for good attack sequences.
It become clear very fast that the strat given in the EJ site was very, very poor.
It seems that it was 'common knowledge' that EJ was "always bullcrap".
(some of those mages words, not mine...)

Wont even bother to tell the tale of the combat rogue with the slow weapon on the off-hand, just because EJ said so...

They 'might' have some good info on their site... but quite honestly... most of what i've seen is crap.

Keep in mind that the contributors to the site can be anyone. There may be some people out there who are in no way qualified to be doing theorycrafting but decide to make a post with an authoratative tone. One of the great strengths of EJ is not the posts of individuals, but the discussion those posts can drum up in the community as a whole. Unfortunately, reading an entire thread can be difficult as the site is also notorious for lengthy discussions that often involve complex math. I'd suggest taking a look at the Think Tank if you need info, but always try to keep in mind that Theorycrafting takes time. If you expect their results to be spot on as soon as the PTR goes up (or even a live patch), you'll be dissappointed.

Heh, also, if you were looking for info on arcane mages then there was a point in time where arcane theorycrafting involved some very advanced math (I believe it's less so now, but I haven't looked into it recently).

[orbathis]

As long as blizz's solution involves less people being able to participate / less people wanting to participate, it is the WRONG solution. They finally have a successful world PvP event, and their solution to lag is, less people join.

I would get fired for presenting a solution like that where I work. It's just pathetic!